![]() Typically, these contracts give the record labels ownership of the master recordings, along with the ability to control the manufacturing, distribution, and promotion of that recording. Artists, like Swift, tend to sign contracts with recording labels who turn the artists’ musical compositions into the master recordings, which are then copyrighted by the label. Why would Taylor Swift (“Swift”) be re-recording her past work? Well, the answer is simple. "Since Taylor's decision to leave Big Machine last fall, we have continued to honor all of her requests to license her catalog to third parties as she promotes her current record in which we do not financially participate.With the upcoming release of Taylor Swift’s re-recorded album Red ( Taylor’s Version), on November 19 th 2021, Swift fans are getting ready to experience this album all over again just nine years after the original release of the album. ![]() In fact, we do not have the right to keep her from performing live anywhere," Big Machine Records' statement said. "At no point did we say Taylor could not perform on the AMAs or block her Netflix special. Swift also claimed she was denied permission to include songs from her first six albums - "Taylor Swift," "Fearless," "Speak Now," "Red," "1989," and "Reputation" - in a forthcoming Netflix documentary. On Friday morning, Big Machine Records responded to Swift's assertions that Scott Borchetta and Scooter Braun were preventing her from performing a medley of songs from her back catalog during the upcoming American Music Awards, where she will be honored as the artist of the decade. Kevin Mazur/Getty Images for Ithaca Holdingsīig Machine Records denies that it's keeping Swift from performing her old music ![]() Scooter Braun purchased Big Machine Records, including Taylor Swift's masters, from Scott Borchetta. "To avoid an argument over rights, Taylor performed three songs off her new album 'Lover' at the Double Eleven event as it was clear that Big Machine Label Group felt any televised performance of catalog songs violated her agreement," the statement continued. the Vice President, Rights Management and Business Affairs from Big Machine Label Group sent Taylor Swift's team the following: 'Please be advised that BMLG will not agree to issue licenses for existing recordings or waivers of its re-recording restrictions in connection with these two projects: The Netflix documentary and The Alibaba "Double Eleven" event.'" Swift's spokeswoman provided a statement to Insider that began: "The truth is, on October 28, 2019, at 5:17 p.m. Swift's spokeswoman shared an email she says is from Big Machine Records that appears to back Swift's allegation that she is being prevented from performing her old songs Now, Swift's spokeswoman has responded to a statement by Big Machine Records that denied the singer's claims that she had been prevented from performing her catalog of music. In a message to fans on Thursday night, the 29-year-old superstar said that she was being prevented from performing her old songs by the company. Taylor Swift is at war with her former label, Big Machine Records.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |